Italian newspaper claims Alonso was at loggerheads with Ferrari at Indian Grand Prix

October 30, 2012 in DRS, F1, Felipe Massa, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, FIA, Formula 1, Grand Prixs, Indian Grand Prix, Teams & Drivers

By Ryan Bayona (Fernando Alonso) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) or CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia CommonsWith the grid swiftly moving on to the middle east for this weekend’s Abu Dhabi grand prix, there has been little time for the teams to celebrate, make excuses or to lick wounds in the wake of the Indian grand prix. This is understandable; it’s a new event demanding a new start and a clear focus.

One team which you would expect to be licking their wounds more than most is Ferrari. Their main man Fernando Alonso fell further behind in the title race, seemingly powerless to stop the charging bull that is Sebastian Vettel. The pressure put on Ferrari as a result of sunday’s (and previous) grand prix has been massive. When you have one of the largest car groups in the world as a parent company (Fiat), a reputation as a premium sports and F1 car maker to protect, and a passionate country behind you, this pressure is entirely comprehensible. That pressure almost became too much this weekend.

That is, at least, according to Italian newspaper La stampa. Read the rest of this entry →

Related Posts:

Indian Grand Prix: How can Alonso beat Vettel?

October 27, 2012 in DRS, F1, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Formula 1, Jenson Button, Lewis Hamilton, Mark Webber, McLaren, Red Bull Racing, Sebastian Vettel

By Nic Redhead (Flickr: Fernando Alonso) [CC-BY-SA-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

After qualifying for the Indian Grand Prix, it is certainly advantage Sebastian Vettel in the championship race. Qualifying on pole with a single scorching lap in Q3, Vettel confirmed Red Bull’s qualifying pace and delivered a stark warning to his nearest rival, Fernando Alonso. Despite appearing to have the second best pace of the leading constructors throughout the three practice sessions behind Red Bull, Ferrari found themselves behind McLaren too, leaving Alonso in 5th position. With no grid penalties this time around to help him, the Spaniard now has 3 cars between himself and Vettel, none of which are going to aid him in pursuing the German.

The question that the Ferrari management, strategists and mechanics will be asking in their debriefing is “how can Alonso beat Vettel?” Unfortunately, the answer will be, “he can’t”. Almost certainly the words “damage limitation” will be muttered in Italian too.

Vettel holds such a monopoly over the rest of the field now in terms of qualifying pace that it doesn’t necessarily matter if he doesn’t have the fastest pace on race day. Vettel will have a rear-gunner right behind him, in the form of the supposedly non-yielding Mark Webber. Even the most uninformed of pundits would be able to detect that that interview on Thursday was just fighting talk, and that he’ll be supporting Vettel. With his help, just like in Korea and Japan, Vettel can easily deploy the tactics which proved so formidable in 2011.

Read the rest of this entry →

Related Posts:

Has DRS made racing artificial?

January 6, 2012 in DRS, F1 2012, FIA, Uncategorized


During the start of the season some fans and commentators were annoyed at the introduction of DRS, Drag Reduction System, to the sport, saying that it made overtaking too easy and therefore made racing artificial. Some drivers and fans still feel this way but as the new season is just over 2 months away, I’m going to take a look at just exactly what DRS has done. 

For those of you who don’t know, DRS stands for Drag Reduction system and it really is quite simple. At certain parts of the track if a driver is 1 second or less behind the driver infront of them, they have the ability to open their rear wing, as the picture to the left shows. This reduces downforce to give to car up to 8 mp/h or 12 km/h extra miles an hour with the intention of assisting overtaking.

On the majority of tracks there was one DRS zone, however some tracks such as Canada or Abu Dhabi had two DRS zones.

Two DRS zones was pretty pointless to be honest. The driver behind just before the first DRS zone would use it to overtake the driver infront and then on the second DRS zone they’d get overtaken by the driver they’d just overtaken. If that makes sense. So I hope we don’t see two DRS zones again.

I don’t really like DRS to be honest on the principle that it’s not raw racing however, for me DRS worked perfectly when it allowed the driver to get a little closer and then overtake a few corners later and on a few occasions that happened. However at some tracks it made overtaking too easy.

My main issue with this is that it’s an unfair advantage on the driver behind. The driver infront can’t deploy DRS in his defence so he just has to sit there and wait to be overtaken and then may spend the next few laps being held up. So in that respect it makes racing very artificial for me.

Lets not forget Ferrari’s Fernando Alonso’s little incident where the DRS malfunctioned and opened all on it’s own. I believe it was geniune, though there are people who don’t, either way it gave him an unfair advantage. One the other hand there were times when some drivers couldn’t get their DRS to open, meaning they were at a disadvantage. Obviously a malfunction isn’t something that can be helped but if DRS won’t work a driver will be at a severe disadvantage, this is why I don’t like these little gadgets.

Before the season starts I think DRS needs to be seriously reviewed. We’ve been to each track on the calendar now, aside from the Circuit of the Americas, so we know how it worked last year. So if it was too easy then shorten the section of track it can be used for and in the interest of fairness, where it didn’t work lengthen the section of track it can be used for or change the section of track it can be used for. Whatever the FIA do, lets not see anymore double DRS zones okay chaps and chapesses? What I want to hear in response is ‘Yes Rosie’.

Personally I’m not a fan of these little contraptions that stop racing being real racing. If it were up to me I’d get rid of DRS, KERS and the blue flag rule. Oh and Bernie please please don’t ever think about installing glorified sprinklers on the track, if you’re going to do that you may as well have a banana skin cannon and turtle shells and turn it into Formula Mario Kart.

What do you think about DRS? Has it made racing artificial? Do you want to see it got rid of or more of it?

 

Related Posts: